1,758 New Guests In 7 Weeks…From $517 In Ad Spend.

Case Study

Fried Chicken · 2 Locations · Southern California

A fried chicken concept launched with ABR and, in 7 weeks, built a 1,758-person database, drove 438 tracked in-store visits, and pulled $6,774 in sales.

2 Location Chicken Sandwich Shop

And this all happened with a $517 Ad Spend using our ABR Customer Acquisition Program.

1,758
opt-ins captured
438
tracked in-store visits
$6,774
tracked sales
13.09x
return on ad spend

Step 1 · Attract Attention

Viral attention. Zero database. A free sandwich gated by an opt-in.

The featured Free Chicken Sandwich offer

Featured Offer

Free Chicken Sandwich

One per guest · opt-in required

Two fried chicken units in Southern California — one in the Inland Empire, one in Orange County. Made-to-order kitchen, strong neighborhood following, and a guest base doing a lot of the brand-building work for free: 745 Google reviews and 834 user-uploaded photos, plus a steady stream of viral content fans were already sharing online.

What they didn't have was a database. No list to warm up, no list to follow up with, no list to own. The ask coming into ABR was simple — turn their viral attention into new customers and a database the restaurant owns.

So we built the offer around the one thing they already did best: their hero product. A free chicken sandwich, redeemable ONLY after a guest joins their marketing program. Customers were STOKED to raise their hand for it — and the restaurant got back a name, email, phone, and birthday on every single one.

It's the cheapest possible way to get new customers. You get the marketing attention, the customer's info, and you drive sales every day.

The ads attracted this attention

66,435
Ad impressions
54,090
Unique people reached
2,932
Post engagements
189
Post shares

Step 2 · Build A Database

A Database They Own.

1,758
Opt-ins captured
1,270
Emails on file
1,398
Phone numbers on file

Where that database showed up in sales

89% of tracked sales came from guests who weren't coming back on their own.

New
57.6%
$2,499 in sales

Brand-new guests walking through the door for the first time. The majority of tracked sales — acquisition is working.

Reactivated
31.1%
$2,542 in sales

Lost guests the offer pulled back in. Actually outspent the "new" bucket on a per-visit basis.

Frequent
11.3%
$957 in sales

The already-loyal guests. Kept in the database, but this wasn't a program designed to re-sell them.

89%
Found Money

89% of tracked sales came from new guests plus reactivated lost guests. That's revenue that wasn't showing up without the program — one of the highest found-money shares across the entire ABR portfolio.

Step 3 · Results, Revenue…ROI

The results — and the economics behind them.

Sales & Operations

438
Tracked in-store visits
18.9%
Redemption rate
$15.47
Average check
$6,773.77
Tracked sales

The ROI

$1.55
Cost per opt-in
$6.40
True CAC (ad + food)
$0.34
Data cost per contact
13.09x
Tracked-sales ROAS

Now the economics: CAC vs LTV

CAC
Customer Acquisition Cost
How much you spend to earn a new customer.
LTV
Lifetime Value
How much that customer will spend over years of visits.

Because marketing isn't for one visit. It's for years of visits.

This restaurant's CAC
$6.40
ad spend ÷ customers who spent money
+ food cost of the promo
Realistic LTV
$600
40 visits × $15 avg check
(low end — 20–30 visits/year is typical)

Would you spend $6.40 to earn $600?
Plus the ad attention and customer data that come with it? We thought so.

Step 4 · Your Turn

This partner chose our ABR Roadshow & Accelerate Program to get these results.

ABR Roadshow van

Click below to schedule a consultation and see if we can help you — and if your restaurant is a great fit for the program.

Imagery

Photos on this page are for visual reference only. Images may not depict the specific restaurant, location, staff, or menu item referenced in the case study.

Results

Case study metrics reflect actual dashboard reporting from the restaurant referenced. Individual restaurant results vary based on market, concept, offer mechanics, operational execution, timing, and other factors. Past performance is not indicative of future results.